Dostoevsky, the author of The Diary of a Writer authors himself first as a child of and then as a father to a new Russia. Kronenburg had an affair with a woman, who unknown to him, became pregnant.
She went to Geneva, where she left her daughter with some peasants. Three years later he went to Geneva to take the girl home to Russia with him — this at the urging of his new mistress.
With the modem novel. Dostoevsky uses the occasion of the Kronenburg trial to make several general remarks about the legal profession, the gist of which is that lawyers are necessarily corrupt. At the end of his discussion of the Kronenburg case, Dostoevsky characterizes the institu- tion of the bar as: a young school of evasiveness of the mind and the withering of the heart, a school where every right feeling is twisted according to ne- cessity, a school of every possible kind of violation, carried out without fear and without punishment, constant and unrelenting, ac- cording to demand, and raised to a kind of principle, and with our lack of experience, raised to a kind of valor, which everyone ap- plauds On the face of it, nothing could be clearer.
The practice of the law is a monstrosity, which contaminates everything it touches, and is praised for the horrors it perpetrates. This sort of characterization can be found in other places in the Diary as well. Furthermore, this attitude mirrors that which was evidenced in certain quarters of the press. According to Pomerants, this hostility to rhetoric had its cultural and historical roots in ancient Russia, which was closer to the Biblical tradition than to the rhetorical traditions of Greece and Rome, In one of his essays the noted nineteenth-century jurist A.
Koni with whom Dostoevsky was in contact seems particularly sensitive to this question about suitable models for Russian courtroom rhetoric. Spasovich was not only a renowned trial lawyer, who participated in many of the sensational political trials of the s and s, but also a brilliant legal theorist.
He is parodied in the character of Fetiukovich in The Brothers Karamazov. The result of this substitution was to destroy any sympathy that the jurors would naturally feel for the victim. In the Kronenburg case the exercise of talent had led Spasovich to stray from the simple facts of the matter, that is, that a child had been cruelly beaten by her father.
Dostoevsky shows that we cannot get to the truth without straying from the simple facts, that is, that the pregnant Kornilova had thrown her stepdaughter from a window in order to take revenge, as she put it, on her husband.
For Dostoevsky, in October , these facts require a more profound understanding, which only he, gies of legal oratory. See A. But this was not always the case. In May Dostoevsky had responded to this case with horror and dismay. He wrote a self-styled parody the word he used is karikatura of what a clever lawyer could do for Kornilova in the way of a defense. The lawyer would describe; Here would come pictures of the impoverished daily life of poor people, eternal work.
She, a simple innocent, an inexperienced girl Gentlemen of the Jury, who of you would not have done the same thing? Who of you would not have thrown [ne vyshvyrnul] the child out of the window? In the next chapter of this May issue, in which Dostoevsky describes his visit to a foundling home, the Kornilova case becomes emblematic of the neglect and abuse of children. He rehearses the details of the case, and then poses a question.
Dostoevsky defends Kornilova on the grounds of temporary insanity due to pregnancy. This process is repeated again in December In that issue, as we will see, Dostoevsky, so to sjjeak, assumes the role of his old adversary Spasovich, from the Kronenburg case, and tries to establish what does and what does not The Kronenbtirg and Kornilova cases curiously mirror each other.
This notion of respon- sibility, or, competence, requires some explanation. In a study of the legal as- pects of mental illness written in , A. People rarely perform actions in a state of unconsciousness, Dostoevsky argues.
Had she not been pregnant, Dostoevsky writes, Kornilova would perhaps have though about, but would not have committed the crime. The very possibility that the pregnancy itself made the difference should have been enough to persuade the jury to act mercifully, Dostoevsky concludes. Having previously castigated juries for acquitting people on the grounds of temporary insanity, Dostoevsky invents his own version of the disease, that is, temporary insanity due to pregnancy, and makes an appeal for mercy on the.
Petersburg, , p. The grounds for the appeal were based on a legal formality: the same individual had testified both in the capacity as a witness and as an expert. Stung by an attack of his defense of Kornilova, pub- lished in The Northern Messenger, he is forced to defend himself.
In so doing, he ends up repeating some of the strategies that Spasovich had used in his de- fense of Kronenburg, strategies that, at the time, had outraged him. The issue in question was whether Kornilova had abused her stepdaughter prior to throwing her out of the window.
Kornilova had beaten her, on one occasion, to the point where welts were raised, but again, this was out of ignorance about childrearing. The child wet her bed, and Kornilova explained that she was told it was necessary to beat her to rid her of the habit. Press, 1 , pp.
Rak has suggested a connection between the Kornilova case and Dmitrii's trial in The Brothers Karamazov on this basis. Gertsentube serves both in the func- tion of medical expert and witness. Rak argues that Dostoevsky intended this technical illegality to provide the grounds for a new trial in some future installment of the novel.
See V. The contradiction seems to be intentional. This narrative has a very simple outline: Dostoevsky constructs an im- age of himself first as a child and then as a father. Where he speaks from the position of the child, he resists the authority of the lawyer and of the father, and then, when he becomes a father, so to speak, he embraces, in a different form, the authority which he had previously resisted.
In Totem and Taboo a mob of rebellious brothers murder their tyrannical father, who has had control over all the available women. The sons can now become fathers. Dostoevsky, ac- cording to Freud, needed to be victimized, or punished, by his father or by a substitute for his fa- ther, namely, the tsar. Dostoevsky must be one with the victim, the beaten child, but only in order to make his authority legitimate. He can be an authority because he has suffered. In the Kronenburg case, Dostoevsky iden- tifies with the child, the victim of the beating.
This process of identification takes several stages, the first of which is the invocation of the time he spent in prison camp in Siberia. As we will see shortly, this time period represents, for Dostoevsky, a kind of second childhood. Prisoners who had run the gauntlet showed very little evidence of their punishment in as few as six days afterwards.
Dostoevsky knows more about suffering than the medical experts, because he himself was a witness to the suffering of his fellow-convicts in Siberia. He legitimates himself on the basis of his own experience. But the more important self-legitimation takes place at a deeper level. Press, Press, , pp. For Robert Louis Jackson, the crucial ingredient of Dostoevsky's Siberian experience is the development of his artistic vision.
But a memory from childhood saves him. Marei made the sign of the cross over him, and had touched him with his earth-stained finger. It is in the memory of Marei that Dostoevsky the convict can overcome his feelings of repulsion for his fellow convicts, whose scarred and branded faces could be concealing another Marei, another, whose son, he Dostoevsky, could possibly be.
Dostoevsky gives Marei distinctly maternal features. On the basis of his Russian childhood, Dostoevsky is able to con- struct a filiation with his fellow-convicts, and by extension, with the Russian people, something that is not available to a foreigner such as Mirecki.
For a discussion of Marei as a mother figure, see James L. There is a parallel between Dostoevsky the child in his meeting with Marei, and the Kronenburg girl in her interaction with the yardkeeper.
Each meeting suggests a kind of primitive, pre-social, pre-linguistic state, in which the father, the law, and authority in general are conspicuously absent, and in which the chief virtue is feminine compassion. The valorization of the pre-social is accompanied by an attack on social institutions. Dostoevsky de-natures parental and state authority.
Children have a superior moral authority over adults be- cause of their innocence. The family is ''made, and not given The state is only as strong as the families which sustain it. Dostoevsky rejects this line of reasoning, and especially the link between the power of the state and the family. By the end of the Kronenburg piece, we have returned to a point of ori- gin, a beginning.
Everything that is new and innocent is valorized, not only the child, but Russia itself, and Dostoevsky himself, whose innocence is won by suffering, and whose identification with the child and with the simple Russian people must be re4:onstructed from his past.
In foregrounding the new, Dostoevsky dismantles everything that belongs to the old. The authority of the father, upon which, according to Spasovich, the state rests, is suggestively likened by Dostoevsky to an old idol, for which the new Russia no longer has any need. The new legal science is also associated with the ancient April 15, For Dostoevsky this rhetoric represents only one stage in the maturation of his public persona.
Kronenburg is a false father, and Spasovich is a false author- ity, who generates a false narrative, one that comes from the letter, and not from the spirit. But the idealized scenes that Dostoevsky creates — of himself as a child alone in a field with the peasant Marei, or of the Kronenburg child alone with the yardkeeper — are also incomplete.
Children with fathers and without fathers in particular In the Sankipeierburgskie vedomosti for February 1, No. The institutions of the modern Western world, it would seem, reduplicate the over-sophistication and corruption of the ancient world.
For a discussion of the Vekhi group, see L. Tkachev, which rejected the Slavophile claim as to the unsuitability of the Russian character for jury duty , note to p. It is not Just the Russian child who is orphaned, as in the Kronenburg piece, it is all Russian fathers who are orphaned — they lack a guiding idea. Russia is without a father, without law, without an authoritative center. Dostoevsky wants to recuperate some principle upon which order could be re-constructed.
Russia cannot remain in its pre-social state, without whole, integrated fami- lies, without social organization, and without language. A new father is needed, a new voice of male authority, and Dostoevsky, having legitimized himself as one with the suffering child, will be able to offer himself for that role.
The parents were charged with having singled out three of their children for special ill-treatment. As in the Kronenburg case, the parents were acquitted. In his essay on the Dzhunkovskii case, Dostoevsky uses a very telling device. He notes that when people are acquitted, sometimes the chairman of the court takes the opportunity to make some remarks of an edifying nature, in order that the accused may avoid trou- Legal Fiction in Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer ble in the future 25; In the Kronenburg case, Dostoevsky rejected the reasoning used by Spasovich, who argued that the state depended on strong families.
Dostoevsky, having uttered his paternal and authoritative word in the Dzhunkovskii case July-August , will continue in the same vein in his final discussion of the Kornilova case December He plays the role of her judge, teacher, and husband. Kornilov told Dostoevsky when his wife was finally returned to him, the first thing he did was to pull out his Gospels and read to her.
Dostoevsky constructs a little story with this bit of information, in which his narrative stance is one of om- niscience. Kornilov is a predictable type, Dostoevsky says.
He could not have done otherwise than to read the Gospels to his wife. But there is an important sense in which Dostoevsky himself has claimed a similar sort of power over Kornilova.
But it is more the case that he is quoting himself. It turns out that Dostoevsky had himself already given Kornilova her moral lesson. He had gone to teach Kornilova how to live in Siberia, should that be her fate, on the evening of her re trial. Should this befall Kornilova, her daughter, to whom she had just given birth in prison, must follow in her footsteps.
This is the reasoning that motivates Dostoevsky to go see Kornilova, he tell us. The authority that Dostoevsky claims over Kornilova is not limited to the pages of his Diary, but extends into his real-life interactions with her.
Dostoevsky's final discussion of the Kornilova case coincides with another important moment of closure, which he notes himself, that is, the end of the Diary's first two years of publication. By this point, Dostoevsky has completed the maturation of his public persona. He has constructed him- self as a father, whose offspring are his readers. The critics were extremely negative in Dostoevsky has begun to dispense advice to many of them.
Caryl Emerson Minneapolis: Univ. Sankt-Peterburgskie vedomosti. Peterburgskaia gazeia. The verse was by D. Not only has Dostoevsky authored his own au- thoritative role as the Diarist, but he claims to have authored his own reading audience, to have fathered a community of like-minded readers. There is another sense in which Dostoevsky has authored himself as a father in his Diary. It was the reconstruction of his childhood memory of the peasant Marei that saved the adult Dostoevsky in prison camp from his feelings of repulsion for his fellow convicts.
This work of re-creating beautiful and positive memories and images, the task of every father, is also the task of Dostoevsky the Diarist, the father of a new Russia. The Diary of a Writer will provide a storehouse of beautiful and positive images for the future Russia, to create a sense of a whole out of the numerous fragments of everyday Russian life.
A new transformed Russia is just beyond our grasp, he seems to be saying. University of California, Davis As Leonid Grossman has written. Dostoevsky Studies, 1, No. The earlier notion of Dostoevsky, the careless and verbose writer, widespread at the end of the nineteenth and the early decades of the twentieth century, has been replaced, step by step, by its opposite: Dostoevsky, the careful craftsman who constructed his texts, in- terconnecting the various levels in a complex system of cross-references, which has long eluded attempts to analyze and describe in an adequate man- ner.
We are conscious of their multilevelled structure and their symbolic and allegorical levels of meaning. Yet, neverthe- less, there are still aspects of which we are not aware and texts that have re- tained an enigmatic appeal, the reader experiencing frustration knowing that he knows less than there is to be known — the text still withholding some essential information.
The Dream of a Ridiculous Man is a case in point. Among Ihe attempts to reconstruct the underlying structure of Dostoevskian texts, the following studies should be mentioned: R. Peace has investigated the great novels with particular attention to the symbolic and allegoric patterns of meaning in his book Dostoevsky: An Examination of the Major Novels Cambridge; Cambridge Univ.
Press, ; H. Gerigk has laid bare the allegoric level in The Brothers Karamazov in his Afterword to the dtv Diinndruck edition of the novel dtv, v.
See also R. Like Zosima, 3. Rasskazy Petrozavodsk; Kareliia, , p. Russian Literature, No. Lauth, Dostojewski und sein Jahrhundert Bonn: Bouvier, , p. Dostoevskii, Poinoe sobranie sochinenii v ti tt. This is also pointed out by Tunimanov. See n. Braun also points to as- pects of the text linking it to earlier works by Dostoevsky.
He mentions Svidrigailov who, in his last night before committing suicide, dreams of a little maltreated girl. It is the same star that, observed on his way home, had given him the idea of committing suicide. Tunimanov refers in particular to two texts by Voltaire: Candide and Micromegas as textual models for Dostoevsky. Braun, Dostojewski].
Neither should we forget the autobiographical aspects. Page references to this edition will appear in the text. See PSS. XXV Onasch, Dostojewski als Veifuhrer, p. Journeys surpassing the technical capabilities of nineteenth-century man, whether magical or supposedly real, were not rare in literature. We can differ- entiate between four varieties of such journeys: I. In this context, we might refer to a distant predecessor of J.
Having examined contextual and intertextual evidence — if only curso- rily — without reaching satisfactory results, we might next look for internal textual evidence testifying to the necessity of including the interplanetary journey in The Dream. Dostoevsky has set his story within a double frame, as it were.
Chapter 1 and the greater portion of chapter 2 are set in St. Petersburg, as are the final pages of chapter 5. The outer frame is formed by the dream i. A second, inner frame -— the interplanetary journey — leads to the central section of the dream — the vision of the Golden Age and the Fall.
The reader may well ask himself why the writer found it necessary to in- Actually, we could speak of a triple frame, adding St. Petersburg, where the story begins ;uid ends, as a third, outer frame. The Dream of a Ridiculous Man troduce it in the first place.
Following his imaginary death, the hero might have simply found himself transported in time to an earth still in its para- disiacal state before the Fall. We might argue that it is actually irrelevant whether the Ridiculous Man reaches this earthly paradise via a space journey or is directly transported to it in time.
After all, Dostoevsky did not hide the obvious fact that he modelled his paradise on ancient Greek and Roman myths. The character of the text as an allegory would have become even more poignant. The struc- ture of a frame formed by the dream does not require a second frame. Should 1 or should I not have felt ashamed of that action? However, while this realistic motivation does explain the fact that the hero dreams of Just such a Journey, it does not tell us anything about the author's motiva- tions, i.
His usually dire financial situation forced him to concern himself with the pecuniary aspects of his literary work. Hence the emphasis on crime, sex, dis- ease, and certain religious and political phenomena of his time.
Topicality, in this sense, is not only a necessary ingredient of a Dostoevskian text, it is, indeed, part of the very fabric of the text providing the link to the more serious concerns of the writer.
The kind of topicality that interested Dostoevsky rested upon the requirements of popular prose as listed, for example, by Osip Senkovsky — a master of the trade in guessing the likes and dislikes of the public. Yet this was not enough for Dostoevsky. Topicality in his sense had to express not only some essential problem of the time, it Petersburg: The Dream of a Ridiculous Man should simultaneously address itself to those aspects of man and society that transcend temporal limitations.
Dostoevsky presents another variant of con- temporary man, he confronts the readers with the ills of contemporary society see the poor, dejected girl roaming the streets of the capital, first rejected, later comforted by the hero. See Jean Variier, Allan Kardec. Connaissance du Spiritisme Paris: See also Ernst Benz, Ausserirdische Welten. In Revue Spirite, and IK2 Dostoevsky Studies words, was not far from hell. He considered it a place of purification of sinful spirits.
Behind this view is the assumption that distant planets serve as liv- ing places for the spirits of the dead. In fact, it touches on one of the most sensitive areas in the intellectual and philosophical evolution of modern European society. This view was radically un- dermined by the findings of Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton. It was re- moved from the center, its role in divine providence was questioned. Major philosophers like Kant and Schelling, religious thinkers and mystics, later Joined by the representatives of nineteenth-century spiritism, pondered the role of the heavenly bodies in providence, the question of extraterrestrial civi- lizations, the transmigration of souls from one solar system to another after death, and similar questions.
In fact, there is a series of texts, many by the Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, Vorwort.. This certainly was not true of the Christian churches which fought the Copemican system nght into the eighteenth century. See Benz, Ausserirdische Wellen, p. A brief examination of some texts in particular those which may have been known to the writer, will fur- ther clarify the matter. He referred to Nicolas Cusanus and Giordano Bruno as authorities on this matter.
Johann Heinrich Lambert extended these views to encompass other solar systems, saying that each contained inhabited planets revolving around a sun. The view that there was life on distant heavenly bodies — probably extending throughout the universe! Dostoevsky had an in- terest in Kant, probably extending beyond esthetics as shown by Golosovker and Gerigk. Benz, Ausserirdische Wehen, p. Kant thinks that the planets are mostly inhabited, and that the spiritual nature of the inhabitants is determined by their distance from the sun; the further away from the sun, the more refined and spiritual the inhabitants.
Kant even posed the question as to whether or not sin ruled other planets as much as it did the earth. In his Aussichren in die Ewigkeit. In Briefen an Hr.
See H. Allgemeine Naturgeschichte, p. Schulthoss, , p. The Dream of a Ridiculous Man Moscow, Flammarion had also studied the question of the plurality of worlds and had a strong interest in parapsychological phenomena! In volume 1 of his Opera Philosophica et Mineralia Swedenborg argued that any newly-arising world in the uni- verse would be similar to our world in its youth! Our earthly. Flammarion, founder of the French Astronomical Society, had a serious interest in parapsychological phenomena.
Pisanii Leipzig: Dostoevsky also possessed A. Opytnye issledovaniia nod psikhicheskoi siloi. Aksakov St. For a comprehensive treatment of the subject, see Benz, Ausserirdische Welten note 23 above. Oetinger quotes Revelation In addition, Strakhov interested himself in the teachings of Swedenborg. Strakhov was well aware of his predecessors in the tradition of the subject under discussion and quoted from the works of Fontenelle and Huygens, which have been mentioned above. Apart from A. Petersburg: A.
Butlerov , a professor of chemistry, and N. Vagner , a professor of zoology, with whom Dostoevesky corre- sponded. In summer of , Dostoevsky and Vagner met in Staraia Russa. Aksakov, the main proponent of spiritism, was an indefatigable propagandist, founder of the journal Psychische Studien in Leipzig, where he now lived. His main work The Principles of Nature , dictated in trance, was described as a mixture of a poetic and vision- ary cosmology and early utopian socialist thinking — a combination that ought to have fascinated Dostoevsky!
He was avowedly im- pressed by mediumistic experiments, yet remained adamantly opposed to spiritism on religious grounds, even putting it on a level with nihilism. He had reason to be afraid as he himself admittedly had been af- fected by spiritism in this regard. It found a parallel in another area of strong interest on the part of Dostoevsky. Beginning with his early work The Leipzig: Literaturnoe nasledstvo, 86 Moscow; Nauka, , p. XXII, 99f. Lilerarurnoe nasledstvo.
Beginning in December and continuing throughout the winter and spring of , Prof. Mendeleev gave a series of public lectures on spiritism which had a lively echo in the press and in public discussion.
At any rate, hyperconsciousness exposed the individual to influences reaching him from beyond the limits of his physical existence. He even claimed that under certain circumstances such as in states of heightened awareness, be they caused by disease or dreams, man could estab- lish contact with an intangible world that existed alongside our visible and tangible world.
Svidrigailov makes an interesting comment in this context: Ghosts are, so to say, chunks and shreds of other worlds, their be- ginning. There is no reason why a healthy person should see them, because a healthy person is most firmly bound to earth and necessar- ily must live the earthly life alone for the sake of fullness and order.
But no sooner has he fallen sick, hardly has the normal, earthly or- der of his organism been upset, and immediately, the possibility of another world begins to become apparent to him and the sicker he is, the greater the number of contacts with the other world so that when man dies completely he directly passes into this other world.
This would apply to Svidrigailov as much as to the Ridiculous Man not to mention other Dostoevskian characters! Literaturnoe nasledsWo. Gerigk , and the integrative function of topicality.
We could construct a three-tiered model containing the key not only to the unexplained aspects of The Dream, but also for other texts by Dostoevsky. His poetics required the integration of the particulars of plot, character, and idea on three levels: 1. The three levels must be integrated by some actual event of more than passing interest. In case of The Dream, this was provided by the discussion of spiritism in Russian public opinion in the middle seventies.
The aforementioned com- mission headed by Professor D. Mendeleev, charged with the task of inves- tigating the claims of spiritists to establishing contact with the spirits of the deceased, had excited much public interest and discussion.
As far as Dostoevsky is concerned, this discussion actualized his longstanding interest in abnonnal states of mind leading to contact with a reality beyond reality and exposing the individual to influences from a transcendent realm. The books by Strakhov, Aksakov and others, which Dostoevsky read in the early seventies in connection with the general increase in interest in spiritism, were a further contributing factor. Thus it is not difficult to perceive the or- ganizing function of topicality, in the Dostoevskian understanding of t'ne term, in the poetics of The Dream of a Ridiculous Man.
He could be sure that such references would catch the eye of those who followed with interest the debates on spiritist phenomena.
University of Klagenfurt Dostoevsky Studies, 1. I, No. It has been the intention of the compilers that the Current Bibliography, when used as a supplement to the preceding issues of the IDS Bulletin and Dostoevsky Studies, be as nearly inclusive as possible of all material pub- lished from to through the present year.
It is our aim for the bibliogra- phy to eventually be exhaustive. Consequently, the latest year is usually the least represented and the earlier years become more and more complete as time goes by.
In general, we can say that over a three to four year pieriod, the entries for the first of these years will be nearly complete. Every attempt has been made to provide full, clear citations, and a spe- cial effort has been made to keep together all citations by one author, disre- garding the variations in spelling and transliteration which can occur when an author publishes in a variety of languages.
Likewise, any additional information which is not a part of the citation itself, but which may provide clarification of the topic in relation to Dostoevsky is also given in brackets after the citation. Leningrad: Nauka, , pp. Allain, L. Dostoevskii i bog. Thompson, ed. Houston; Rice University Press. Moskva; Nauka, , v. Amaral, M. Amoia, Alba della Fazia. Feodor Dostoevsky. New York; Continuum, Leninoi N. Leningrad; Gos.
Saltykova- Shchedrina, , pp. Antonit, Mitropolit. Antsiferov, N. Dusha Peterburga. Peterburg Dostoevskogo. Byl i mif Peterburga. Pokrovskaia, ed.
Moskva; Kniga, Peterburg: Brokgauz-Efron, , , , respectively. See Likhachev citation below for commentary. Arkhipov, A. Avramets, I. Trudy po russkoi i slavianskoi filologii Backes, J.
Klasik ruskej literatury. Current Bibliography Bazhin, E. Toistogo i Krotkaia Dostoevskogo. Opyt sopostav. Belknap, R. The Structure of "The Brothers Karamazov".
Belov, S. Fedor Mikhailovich Dostoevskii: Kniga dlia uchitelia. Moskva; Prosveshchenie, Belovolov, G. Berdiaev, N. The Russian Idea. French, tr. Hudson, NY; Lindisfame Press, Princeton, N. Bernstein, M. Bitiugova, I. Moskva; Nauka, , V. Boeva, L. Borisova, A. Translated from the Polish by R. New York: Random House, , pp.
Buber, M. Praha: Vysehrad, , pp. Budanova, N. Moskva: Nauka, , v. Bukowski, J. Krakow: ZNAK, , pp. Bulanov, A. Filosofsko-eticheskie iskaniia i russkoi literature 2-i poloviny 19 v. Dostoevskogo i L. Volgograd: Volgogradskii pedagogicheskii institut, Moskva: Nauka, , V.
Cadot, M. Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy, , pp. Carotenuto, A. Dostojevskij v recepcii. Studie, 9 Chardin, P. Current Bibliography Chardin, P. Chase, L. Contino, P. University of Notre Dame, Corcos, M. Cosic, B. Beograd: Prosveta, Cox, G. Rancour-Laferrier, ed. Amsterdam; Philadelphia; John Benjamins Publishing, , pp. Crowder, C. Jasper, C. Crowder, eds. New York; St. Dalton, E.
Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, , pp. Danow, D. New York: St. McMillin, ed. De Vidovich, S. Dostoevski], II Sosia. Dcvitskii, I. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly 6 : Dneprov, V. Dobrev, Ch. Dostoevskaia, I-. Dostoevskii v izobrazhenii svoei docheri. Istoriko-liter- aturnye vospominaniia Dostoevskii: Materialy i issledovaniia. Leningrad: Nauka, Dostoevskii, F. M, Vozvrashchenie cheloveka. Stakhanova, comp. Introduction by K, 1. Moskva: Sovetskaia Rossiia, Dukkon, A.
Dunin-Borkowski, P. Dyck, J. Dietrick, D. John, eds. Waterloo, Ont. Dzhekson, R, L. Eidelman, D. Emerson, C. Ermakov, I. Dostoevskii: On i ego proizvedeniia. Erofeev, V. Benson, Vt. Fedorov, G. Felman, S. Finke, M. Mandelker, R. Reeder, eds. Columbus, OH: Slavica, , pp. Fitzgerald, G. Flaker, A. De Haard, T. Langerak, W. Weststeijn, eds. New York: Elsevier, , pp.
Florenskii, P. Turgeneva i F. Flynn, D. Chernyshevskogo i N. Dobroliubova po povodu romana F. Dostoevskogo Unizhennye i oskorblennye," in Druz'ia svohody i dobra. Nizhnii Novgorod: , pp. Freire, A. Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, G. Marcel and Plato] Freud, S. Fridlender, G. Seriia literatury i iazyka 50,5 l Miunkhen; Moskva: , pp. F'usswerk-Fursay, J. Gai, D.
Galkin, A. Siuzhetnye postroeniia proizvedenii F. Dostoevskogo s uchetom osobennostei ego lichnosti. Moskva: Moskovskii gos. Lenina, V otrazhennom svete bolezni. Moskva: Moskovskii pedagogoich- eskii universitet im. Gerigk, H. Lackner, M. Schumann, eds. Hirdt, ed. Bonn; Berlin: Bouvier Verlag, , pp. Studium universale, bd. Anmerkungen zu den Aufzeichnungen aus einem Kellerloch. Geyer, R. Stauffenburg Colloquium, bd.
Pressler Verlag, Germanov, G. Giesemann, G. Ginzburg, L. Translated and edited by J. Rosengrant; Foreward by E. Giuliani, R. Gomez, C. Gourg, M. Grenier, S. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, , pp. Anna Grigor'evna: Roman. Dostoevskaia] Gurg, M. Gustafson, S. Henry, M. Gueguen, M. Henry, J.
Rhodes, eds. Hlatky, E. Gretlund and K. Westarp, eds. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, , pp. Izbrannye sochi- nenii. Moskva: , pp. Hausmann, L. Witte, eds. Ivanchikova, E. Ivanov, A. Dostoevskii v shkole: Materialy v pomoshch' uchiteliu. Magadan: Magadanskii oblastnoi institut usovershenstvovaniia uchitelei, Ivliev, V.
Novye sovetskie issledovaniia eticheskikh vozzrenii F. Dostoevskogo i N. Chernyshevskogo: Nauchno-analiticheskii obzor. Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam, Jovanovic, M. Ni5 Prosveta, , pp.
Kalbouss, G. Needham Hts. Besy: Roman v trekh chastiakh Izhevsk: , pp. Karolev, S. Katz, M. Kautman, F. Praha; Rozmluvy, Keith, Carroll Sue. Khan, H. University of Michigan, Khots, A. Kindlon, P. University of Illinois Chicago, Kjetsaa, G. Hustvedt and D. New York: Fawcett Columbine, Kjetsaa, G. Jensen et al. Kleiman, R. Kishinev: , pp. Kniazev, A. Kodzhaev, M. Kontseptsiia kharaktera v tvorchestve F.
Dostoevskogo Baku: Azerbaidzhanskii pedagogicheskii institut russkogo iazyka i literatury, Korudzhaiev, D. Only 2 left in stock - order soon. The 6th. All Things Work Together. The Search. Only 5 left in stock - order soon. Register a free business account.
Customer reviews. How are ratings calculated? Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Top reviews Most recent Top reviews. Top reviews from the United States. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. Verified Purchase. I have absolutely, totally, and completely fallen in love with this entire album.
I have really enjoyed them all but this Album from Flame is the best so far. So if your thinking of picking up this Album you should grab it, I fully recommend it. Plus of you keep your eyes open you can buy this Album in used condition from Amazon or one of Amazons affiliated online stores. Even if you buy the Album used but in very-good or even better get it in like-new condition and it will still be alot less than the buying it new price.
I purchased mine in this used like-new condition straight from Amazon, and it works perfectly. Surrender feat. Rose is featured on this track and they combine their talents together to make a really good worship song. Power - This song is ok but not great, the "power, p-p power" chant gets old after awhile, good message though.
Nonsense - Good but not great, love the message though. Alive - Flame shares his testimony on this track with some deep story-telling. All I Need feat. Chris Lee - Again another quality track. Move - Highly energetic track with a good message. Put On ft. C-Lite - Andy "C-Lite" Mineo is featured on this track assisting with the vocals to help make a banger of a track.
Double Back feat. Thi'sl - Flame and Thi'sl are on one track, Flame basically raps from Galations 6 and Thi'sl is a good feature for this track, one of my favorites. Captured Me feat. Rose - An ok song, V. Rose uses a little much autotune. Daniel 10 feat. Pastor Ryan Fullerton - Just a snippet of audio from a sermon.
Tonight All of Me feat. One person found this helpful. I got this for my wife's birthday The beats are bangin' and the hooks are off the chain. The other thing that is so incredible is the depth of the lyrics. The first track, with its petition: "cleanse us from our fear of man, we need more than help from this Track No. Rose is bangin' They couldn't have come at a better time I was dealing with some difficult family issues The rest of the album is top notch!
Anyone looking for raw Christian hip hop that is lyrically rich and not bending toward compromise Check it out!!!!!!!
Thanks Flame. Awesome album! This album made me like rap for the first time in my life and I bought it soon as I heard it. I've always hated secular rap cause it's all about thugs, guns, gangs, sex, drugs, promoting bad things.
Secular lyrics made me hate the music style by association. But now after finding Flame Captured I love christian rap. I love the music style now that the lyrics are great as well.
Flame doesn't just rap about morally living right he wraps the right theology as well, keeps your head straight in this world. Due to this album I went and found Tedashii Blacklight and Lecrae rebel the same day as well.Jul 25, · 제주 올레길에 뿌려지는 빗소리 2 The Rain on olle Road of JeJu 2 힐링 네이쳐 Nature Sound Band 03eaaa-4dafae88f2 빅밴드 Don't Keep Me Hanging On Julia Hsu 03e02bcdfa-d1db52d Get Ready Mac Graymer 03e1d1faabfa-baac6c61ea7 Cypresses, B. No. 9, Around the House Now I Stagger.